HomeClinics HomeAbout ClinicsAll ClinicsHot TopicsAdvancesSpecial OffersCME
Logo
Search for

Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages 347-359 (July 2005)


View previous. 9 of 17 View next.

Methodologic Issues in the Comparison of Microsurgical Flaps/Techniques in Head and Neck Reconstruction

Achilleas Thoma, MD, MSc, FRCS(C), FACSaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Sheila Sprague, MScb

This article informs head and neck microsurgeons, investigators, and readers of the head and neck microsurgical literature about key methodologic issues when comparing techniques/flaps in head and neck reconstruction. The following is discussed: (1) the principles of evidence-based microsurgery, (2) the hierarchy of the strength of evidence for treatment decisions in microsurgery, (3) types of questions asked (background and foreground questions) to identify the best available evidence, (4) strategies for searching the head and neck microsurgical literature, (5) issues regarding study outcomes (types, perspective, and time horizon) in microsurgery, (6) the relevance of incorporating economic analyses into head and neck microsurgical trials, and (7) the interpretation and applicability of published study results to an individual microsurgeon's clinical practice.

a Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

b Departments of Surgery and Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Surgical Outcomes Research Centre, St. Joseph's Healthcare, 101–206 James Street South, Hamilton, Ontario L8P 3A9, Canada

PII: S0094-1298(05)00011-8

doi:10.1016/j.cps.2005.02.004


View previous. 9 of 17 View next.