Mesotherapy, Microneedling, and Chemical Peels

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinics in Plastic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Atiyeh B.S.
        • Ibrahim A.E.
        • Dibo S.A.
        Cosmetic mesotherapy: between scientific evidence, science fiction, and lucrative business.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008; 32: 842-849
        • Konda D.
        • Thappa D.M.
        Mesotherapy: what is new?.
        Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2013; 79: 127-134
        • Pistor M.
        What is mesotherapy?.
        Chir Dent Fr. 1976; 46: 59-60
        • Rotunda A.M.
        • Kolodney M.S.
        Mesotherapy and phosphatidylcholine injections: historical clarification and review.
        Dermatol Surg. 2006; 32: 465-480
        • Matarasso A.
        • Pfeifer T.M.
        Mesotherapy for body contouring.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 115: 1420-1424
        • Rohrich R.J.
        Mesotherapy: what is it? Does it work?.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 115: 1425
        • Fernandes D.
        Percutaneous collagen induction: an alternative to laser resurfacing.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2002; 22: 307-309
        • Camirand A.
        • Doucet J.
        Needle dermabrasion.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1997; 21: 48-55
      1. Fernandes D. Skin needling as an alternative to laser. Presented at the International Confederation for Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery Conference. San Francisco (CA), June 26–30, 1999.

        • Amin S.P.
        • Phelps R.G.
        • Goldberg D.J.
        Mesotherapy for facial skin rejuvenation: a clinical, histologic, and electron microscopic evaluation.
        Dermatol Surg. 2006; 32: 1467-1472
        • El-Domyati M.
        • El-Ammawi T.S.
        • Moawad O.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of mesotherapy in facial rejuvenation: a histological and immunohistochemical evaluation.
        Int J Dermatol. 2012; 51: 913-919
        • Gao F.
        • Liu Y.
        • He Y.
        • et al.
        Hyaluronan oligosaccharides promote excisional wound healing through enhanced angiogenesis.
        Matrix Biol. 2010; 29: 107-116
        • Jager C.
        • Brenner C.
        • Habicht J.
        • et al.
        Bioactive reagents used in mesotherapy for skin rejuvenation in vivo induce diverse physiological processes in human skin fibroblasts in vitro- a pilot study.
        Exp Dermatol. 2012; 21: 72-75
        • Savoia A.
        • Landi S.
        • Baldi A.
        A new minimally invasive mesotherapy technique for facial rejuvenation.
        Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2013; 3: 83-93
        • Rittes P.G.
        The use of phosphatidylcholine for correction of lower lid bulging due to prominent fat pads.
        Dermatol Surg. 2001; 27: 391-392
        • Brown S.A.
        The science of mesotherapy: chemical anarchy.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2006; 26: 95-98
        • Salti G.
        • Ghersetich I.
        • Tantussi F.
        • et al.
        Phosphatidylcholine and sodium deoxycholate in the treatment of localized fat: a double-blind, randomized study.
        Dermatol Surg. 2008; 34 ([discussion: 66]): 60-66
        • Schuller-Petrovic S.
        • Wölkart G.
        • Höfler G.
        • et al.
        Tissue-toxic effects of phosphatidylcholine/deoxycholate after subcutaneous injection for fat dissolution in rats and a human volunteer.
        Dermatol Surg. 2008; 34 ([discussion: 542–3]): 529-542
        • Duncan D.I.
        • Palmer M.
        Fat reduction using phosphatidylcholine/sodium deoxycholate injections: standard of practice.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008; 32: 858-872
        • Duncan D.
        • Rubin J.P.
        • Golitz L.
        • et al.
        Refinement of technique in injection lipolysis based on scientific studies and clinical evaluation.
        Clin Plast Surg. 2009; 36 ([discussion: 211–3]): 195-209
        • Rittes P.G.
        The lipodissolve technique: clinical experience.
        Clin Plast Surg. 2009; 36 ([discussion: 223–7]): 215-221
        • Hasengschwandtner F.
        • Gundermann K.J.
        Injection lipolysis with phosphatidylcholine and deoxycholate.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2013; 33: 1071-1072
        • Duncan D.I.
        Response to “Injection lipolysis with phosphatidylcholine and deoxycholate”.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2013; 33: 1073-1075
        • Salti G.
        • Rauso R.
        Comments on “Injection lipolysis with phosphatidylcholine and deoxycholate”.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2014; 34: 639-640
        • Young V.L.
        Response to “Injection lipolysis with phosphatidylcholine and deoxycholate”.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2013; 33: 1076
        • Duncan D.
        • Rotunda A.M.
        Injectable therapies for localized fat loss: state of the art.
        Clin Plast Surg. 2011; 38: 489-501
        • Rotunda A.M.
        • Suzuki H.
        • Moy R.L.
        • et al.
        Detergent effects of sodium deoxycholate are a major feature of an injectable phosphatidylcholine formulation used for localized fat dissolution.
        Dermatol Surg. 2004; 30: 1001-1008
      2. KYTHERA Biopharmaceuticals announces FDA approval of KYBELLA(TM) (also known as ATX-101) — first and only submental contouring injectable drug. In: Media Center, news release. 2015. Available at: http://www.kythera.com/kythera-biopharmaceuticals-announces-fda-approval-of-kybellatm-also-known-as-atx-101-first-and-only-submental-contouring-injectable-drug/. Accessed Ocboter 09, 2015.

        • Jagdeo J.
        What does the data from the ATX-101 phase I safety and pharmacokinetic study tell us?.
        J Drugs Dermatol. 2015; 14: 544-545
        • McDiarmid J.
        • Ruiz J.B.
        • Lee D.
        • et al.
        Results from a pooled analysis of two European, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies of ATX-101 for the pharmacologic reduction of excess submental fat.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014; 38: 849-860
        • Rzany B.
        • Griffiths T.
        • Walker P.
        • et al.
        Reduction of unwanted submental fat with ATX-101 (deoxycholic acid), an adipocytolytic injectable treatment: results from a phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
        Br J Dermatol. 2014; 170: 445-453
        • Ascher B.
        • Hoffmann K.
        • Walker P.
        • et al.
        Efficacy, patient-reported outcomes and safety profile of ATX-101 (deoxycholic acid), an injectable drug for the reduction of unwanted submental fat: results from a phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
        J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014; 28: 1707-1715
      3. Kybella product information. 2015. Available at: https://mykybella.com/wpcontent/uploads/2015/04/KYBELLA-Combined-FINAL-Labeling.pdf. Accessed October 09, 2015.

      4. Neothetics™. Pipeline LIPO 202. 2015. Available at: http://www.neothetics.com/lipo.html. Accessed October 11, 2015.

        • Rauso R.
        • Salti G.A.
        Ce-marked drug used for localized adiposity reduction: a 4-year experience.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2015; 35: 850-857
        • Jayasinghe S.
        • Guillot T.
        • Bissoon L.
        • et al.
        Mesotherapy for local fat reduction.
        Obes Rev. 2013; 14: 780-791
        • Tanner B.
        • Barabas T.
        • Crook D.
        • et al.
        A future for injection lipolysis?.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2013; 33: 456-457
        • Roy D.
        Ablative facial resurfacing.
        Dermatol Clin. 2005; 23: 549-559
        • Ross E.V.
        • Naseef G.S.
        • McKinlay J.R.
        • et al.
        Comparison of carbon dioxide laser, erbium:YAG laser, dermabrasion, and dermatome: a study of thermal damage, wound contraction, and wound healing in a live pig model: implications for skin resurfacing.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000; 42: 92-105
        • Bernstein L.J.
        • Kauvar A.N.
        • Grossman M.C.
        • et al.
        The short- and long-term side effects of carbon dioxide laser resurfacing.
        Dermatol Surg. 1997; 23: 519-525
        • Laws R.A.
        • Finley E.M.
        • McCollough M.L.
        • et al.
        Alabaster skin after carbon dioxide laser resurfacing with histologic correlation.
        Dermatol Surg. 1998; 24: 633-636
        • Fabbrocini G.
        • Fardella N.
        • Monfrecola A.
        • et al.
        Acne scarring treatment using skin needling.
        Clin Exp Dermatol. 2009; 34: 874-879
        • Fife D.
        Practical evaluation and management of atrophic acne scars: tips for the general dermatologist.
        J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2011; 4: 50-57
        • El-Domyati M.
        • Medhat W.
        Minimally invasive facial rejuvenation: current concepts and future expectations.
        Expert Rev Dermatol. 2013; 8: 565-580
        • Schwarz M.
        • Laaff H.
        A prospective controlled assessment of microneedling with the dermaroller device.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127: 146e-148e
        • Ferguson M.W.
        • O'Kane S.
        Scar-free healing: from embryonic mechanisms to adult therapeutic intervention.
        Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004; 359: 839-850
        • Bandyopadhyay B.
        • Fan J.
        • Guan S.
        • et al.
        A “traffic control” role for TGFbeta3: orchestrating dermal and epidermal cell motility during wound healing.
        J Cell Biol. 2006; 172: 1093-1105
        • Fernandes D.
        • Signorini M.
        Combating photoaging with percutaneous collagen induction.
        Clin Dermatol. 2008; 26: 192-199
        • Aust M.C.
        • Fernandes D.
        • Kolokythas P.
        • et al.
        Percutaneous collagen induction therapy: an alternative treatment for scars, wrinkles and skin laxity.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121: 1421-1429
        • Zeitter S.
        • Sikora Z.
        • Jahn S.
        • et al.
        Microneedling: matching the results of medical needling and repetitive treatments to maximize potential for skin regeneration.
        Burns. 2014; 40: 966-973
        • El-Domyati M.
        • Barakat M.
        • Awad S.
        • et al.
        Microneedling therapy for atrophic acne scars: an objective evaluation.
        J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2015; 8: 36-42
        • Dhurat R.
        • Mathapati S.
        Response to microneedling treatment in men with androgenetic alopecia who failed to respond to conventional therapy.
        Indian J Dermatol. 2015; 60: 260-263
        • Chandrashekar B.
        • Yepuri V.
        • Mysore V.
        Alopecia areata-successful outcome with microneedling and triamcinolone acetonide.
        J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2014; 7: 63-64
        • Sezgin B.
        • Ozmen S.
        • Bulam H.
        • et al.
        Improving fat graft survival through preconditioning of the recipient site with microneedling.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014; 67: 712-720
        • Montesi G.
        • Calvieri S.
        • Balzani A.
        • et al.
        Bipolar radiofrequency in the treatment of dermatologic imperfections: clinicopathological and immunohistochemical aspects.
        J Drugs Dermatol. 2007; 6: 890-896
        • Prieto V.G.
        • Zhang P.S.
        • Sadick N.S.
        Evaluation of pulsed light and radiofrequency combined for the treatment of acne vulgaris with histologic analysis of facial skin biopsies.
        J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2005; 7: 63-68
        • Hantash B.M.
        • Ubeid A.A.
        • Chang H.
        • et al.
        Bipolar fractional radiofrequency treatment induces neoelastogenesis and neocollagenesis.
        Lasers Surg Med. 2009; 41: 1-9
        • Kim S.E.
        • Lee J.H.
        • Kwon H.B.
        • et al.
        Greater collagen deposition with the microneedle therapy system than with intense pulsed light.
        Dermatol Surg. 2011; 37: 336-341
        • Min S.
        • Park S.Y.
        • Yoon J.Y.
        • et al.
        Comparison of fractional microneedling radiofrequency and bipolar radiofrequency on acne and acne scar and investigation of mechanism: comparative randomized controlled clinical trial.
        Arch Dermatol Res. 2015; 307: 897-904
        • Akcal A.
        • Savas S.A.
        • Gorgulu T.
        • et al.
        The effect of platelet rich plasma combined with microneedling on full venous outflow compromise in a rat skin flap model.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 136: 71-72
        • Hartmann D.
        • Ruzicka T.
        • Gauglitz G.G.
        Complications associated with cutaneous aesthetic procedures.
        J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2015; 13: 778-786
        • Soltani-Arabshahi R.
        • Wong J.W.
        • Duffy K.L.
        • et al.
        Facial allergic granulomatous reaction and systemic hypersensitivity associated with microneedle therapy for skin rejuvenation.
        JAMA Dermatol. 2014; 150: 68-72
        • Pahwa M.
        • Pahwa P.
        • Zaheer A.
        “Tram track effect” after treatment of acne scars using a microneedling device.
        Dermatol Surg. 2012; 38: 1107-1108
        • Stuzin J.M.
        Phenol peeling and the history of phenol peeling.
        Clin Plast Surg. 1998; 25: 1-19
        • Mangat D.S.
        • Tansavatdi K.
        • Garlich P.
        Current chemical peels and other resurfacing techniques.
        Facial Plast Surg. 2011; 27: 35-49
        • Monheit G.D.
        • Chastain M.A.
        Chemical and mechanical skin resurfacing.
        in: Bolognia J.L. Jorizzo J.L. Schaffer J.V. Dermatology. 3rd edition. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia2012: 2493-2508
        • Jackson A.
        Chemical peels.
        Facial Plast Surg. 2014; 30: 26-34
        • Monheit G.D.
        Medium-depth chemical peels.
        Dermatol Clin. 2001; 19: 413-425
        • Al-Waiz M.M.
        • Al-Sharqi A.I.
        Medium-depth chemical peels in the treatment of acne scars in dark-skinned individuals.
        Dermatol Surg. 2002; 28: 383-387
        • Murad H.
        • Shamban A.T.
        • Premo P.S.
        The use of glycolic acid as a peeling agent.
        Dermatol Clin. 1995; 13: 285-307
        • Tse Y.
        Choosing the correct peel for the appropriate patient.
        in: Tung R. Rubin M.G. Procedures in cosmetic dermatology series: chemical peels. 2nd edition. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia2010: 17-21
        • Van Scott E.J.
        • Yu R.J.
        Hyperkeratinization, corneocyte cohesion, and alpha hydroxy acids.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 1984; 11: 867-879
        • Fartasch M.
        • Teal J.
        • Menon G.K.
        Mode of action of glycolic acid on human stratum corneum: ultrastructural and functional evaluation of the epidermal barrier.
        Arch Dermatol Res. 1997; 289: 404-409
        • Bernstein E.F.
        • Lee J.
        • Brown D.B.
        • et al.
        Glycolic acid treatment increases type I collagen mRNA and hyaluronic acid content of human skin.
        Dermatol Surg. 2001; 27: 429-433
        • Linder J.
        Chemical peels and combination therapies.
        Plast Surg Nurs. 2013; 33: 88-91
        • Sharad J.
        Glycolic acid peel therapy - a current review.
        Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2013; 6: 281-288
        • Nguyen A.T.
        • Ahmad J.
        • Fagien S.
        • et al.
        Cosmetic medicine: facial resurfacing and injectables.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129: 142e-153e
      5. Jennifer, L. Superficial chemical peeling: minimal Effort, maximal results. In: Cosmetic dermatology, vol. 19(4). Available at: http://www.thedermatologist.com/content/superficial-chemical-peeling-minimal-effort-maximum-results-jennifer-linder-md. Acessed October 26, 2015.

        • Dewandre L.
        • Tenenbaum A.
        The chemistry of peels: a hypothesis of action mechanisms and a proposal of a new classification of chemical peelings.
        in: Tung R. Rubin M.G. Procedures in cosmetic dermatology series: chemical peels. 2nd edition. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia2010: 1-16
        • Puri N.
        Comparative study of 15% TCA peel versus 35% glycolic acid peel for the treatment of melasma.
        Indian Dermatol Online J. 2012; 3: 109-113
        • Kubiak M.
        • Mucha P.
        • Dębowska R.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of 70% glycolic peels versus 15% trichloroacetic peels for the treatment of photodamaged facial skin in aging women.
        Dermatol Surg. 2014; 40: 883-891
        • Sacchidanand S.
        • Shetty A.B.
        • Leelavathy B.
        Efficacy of 15% trichloroacetic acid and 50% glycolic acid peel in the treatment of frictional melanosis: a comparative study.
        J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2015; 8: 37-41
        • Peters W.
        Full-thickness facial chemical burn from a “50% TCA” peel.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995; 95: 602-603
        • Stuzin J.M.
        • Baker T.J.
        • Gordon H.L.
        Treatment of photoaging. Facial chemical peeling (phenol and trichloroacetic acid) and dermabrasion.
        Clin Plast Surg. 1993; 20: 9-25
        • Effron C.
        • Briden M.E.
        • Green B.A.
        Enhancing cosmetic outcomes by combining superficial glycolic acid (alpha-hydroxy acid) peels with nonablative lasers, intense pulsed light, and trichloroacetic acid peels.
        Cutis. 2007; 79: 4-8
        • Fulton J.E.
        • Porumb S.
        Chemical peels: their place within the range of resurfacing techniques.
        Am J Clin Dermatol. 2004; 5: 179-187
        • Fung J.F.
        • Sengelmann R.D.
        • Kenneally C.Z.
        Chemical injury to the eye from trichloroacetic acid.
        Dermatol Surg. 2002; 28: 609-610
        • Dinner M.I.
        • Artz J.S.
        The art of the trichloroacetic acid chemical peel.
        Clin Plast Surg. 1998; 25: 53-62
        • AYRES 3rd, S.
        Dermal changes following application of chemical cauterants to aging skin. Superficial chemosurgery.
        Arch Dermatol. 1960; 82: 578-585
        • Baker T.J.
        • Gordon H.L.
        • Mosienko P.
        • et al.
        Long-term histological study of skin after chemical face peeling.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974; 53: 522-525
        • Stone P.A.
        The use of modified phenol for chemical face peeling.
        Clin Plast Surg. 1998; 25: 21-44
        • Park J.H.
        • Choi Y.D.
        • Kim S.W.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of modified phenol peel (Exoderm) on facial wrinkles, acne scars and other skin problems of Asian patients.
        J Dermatol. 2007; 34: 17-24
        • Piamphongsant T.
        Phenol-castor oil: modified peel for dermal melasma.
        Dermatol Surg. 2006; 32: 611-617
        • Hetter G.P.
        An examination of the phenol-croton oil peel: Part III. The plastic surgeons' role.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 105: 752-763
        • Hetter G.P.
        An examination of the phenol-croton oil peel: Part IV. Face peel results with different concentrations of phenol and croton oil.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 105 ([discussion: 1084–7]): 1061-1083
        • Hetter G.P.
        An examination of the phenol-croton oil peel: Part II. The lay peelers and their croton oil formulas.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 105: 240-248
        • Hetter G.P.
        An examination of the phenol-croton oil peel: part I. Dissecting the formula.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 105 ([discussion: 249–51]): 227-239
        • Peled I.J.
        • Ullmann Y.
        • Ramon I.
        Chemical peeling: an alternative to rhytidoplasty.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1996; 20: 333-336
        • Gross B.G.
        Cardiac arrhythmias during phenol face peeling.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1984; 73: 590-594
        • Truppman E.S.
        • Ellenby J.D.
        Major electrocardiographic changes during chemical face peeling.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979; 63: 44-48
        • Binstock J.H.
        Safety of chemical face peels.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 1982; 7: 137-138
        • Kim D.W.
        • Ahn D.S.
        Delayed wound healing and scarring after combined ablative laser and phenol peel treatment.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010; 63: e484-e485