The Use of TIGR Matrix in Breast Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery

Is a Resorbable Synthetic Mesh a Viable Alternative to Acellular Dermal Matrices?
Published:September 16, 2017DOI:


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      Purchase one-time access
      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.
      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.
      Subscribe to Clinics in Plastic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Becker H.
        • Lind J.G.
        The use of synthetic mesh in reconstructive, revision, and cosmetic breast surgery.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013; 37: 914
        • Dieterich M.
        • Paepke S.
        • Zwiefel K.
        • et al.
        Implant-based breast reconstruction using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP Bra): a multicenter study of 231 cases.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 132: 8e-19e
        • Schrenk P.
        Immediate implant-based breast reconstruction using the TIGR® Matrix mesh.
        Breast Cancer Management. 2016; 5: 53-59
        • Ribeiro L.
        • Accorsi Jr., A.
        • Buss A.
        • et al.
        Creation and evolution of 30 years of the inferior pedicle in reduction mammaplasties.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 110: 960-970
        • Ribeiro L.
        A new technique for reduction mammaplasty.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1975; 55: 330-334
        • Brown R.H.
        • Izaddoost S.
        • Bullocks J.M.
        Preventing the ‘‘Bottoming Out’’ and ‘‘Star-gazing’’ phenomena in inferior pedicle breast reduction with an acellular dermal matrix internal brassiere.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2010; 34: 760-767
        • Draper L.B.
        • Disa J.J.
        Do acellularized dermal matrices change the rationale for immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction?.
        Clin Plast Surg. 2012; 39: 113-118
        • Ayeni O.A.
        • Ibrahim A.M.
        • Lin S.J.
        • et al.
        Acellular dermal matrices in breast surgery: tips and pearls.
        Clin Plast Surg. 2012; 39: 177-186
        • Scheflan M.
        • Colwell A.S.
        Tissue reinforcement in implant-based breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014; 2: e192
        • Macadam S.A.
        • Lennox P.A.
        Acellular dermal matrices: use in reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery.
        Can J Plast Surg. 2012; 20: 75-89
        • Hjort H.
        • Mathisen T.
        • Alves A.
        • et al.
        Three-year results from a preclinical implantation study of a long-term resorbable surgical mesh with time-dependent mechanical characteristics.
        Hernia. 2012; 16: 191-197
        • Dieterich M.
        • Faridi A.
        Biological matrices and synthetic meshes used in implant-based breast reconstruction – a review of products available in Germany.
        Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2013; 73: 1100-1106
        • Colwell A.S.
        • Damjanovic B.
        • Zahedi B.
        • et al.
        Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128: 1170-1178
        • McCarthy C.M.
        • Lee C.N.
        • Halvorson E.G.
        • et al.
        The use of acellular dermal matrices in two-stage expander/implant reconstruction: a multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trial.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 130: 57S-66S
        • Parks J.W.
        • Hammond S.E.
        • Walsh W.A.
        • et al.
        Human acellular dermis versus no acellular dermis in tissue expansion breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 130: 739-746
        • Seth A.K.
        • Hirsch E.M.
        • Fine N.A.
        • et al.
        Utility of acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction in the setting of radiation: a comparative analysis.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 130: 750-758
        • Peled A.W.
        • Foster R.D.
        • Garwood E.R.
        • et al.
        The effects of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant breast reconstruction after total skin-sparing mastectomy: results of a prospective practice improvement study.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129: 901e-908e
        • Weichman K.E.
        • Wilson S.C.
        • Weinstein A.L.
        • et al.
        The use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129: 1049-1058
        • Vardanian A.J.
        • Clayton J.L.
        • Roostaeian J.
        • et al.
        Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128: 403e-410e
        • Liu A.S.
        • Kao H.K.
        • Reish R.G.
        • et al.
        Postoperative complications in prosthesis-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127: 1755-1762
        • Hanna K.R.
        • DeGeorge Jr., B.R.
        • Mericli A.F.
        • et al.
        Comparison study of two types of expander-based breast reconstruction: acellular dermal matrix-assisted versus total submuscular placement.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2013; 70: 10-15
        • Antony A.K.
        • McCarthy C.M.
        • Cordeiro P.G.
        • et al.
        Acellular human dermis implantation in 153 immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstructions: determining the incidence and significant predictors of complications.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 125: 1606-1614
        • Lanier S.T.
        • Wang E.D.
        • Chen J.J.
        • et al.
        The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2010; 64: 674-678
        • Chun Y.S.
        • Verma K.
        • Rosen H.
        • et al.
        Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 125: 429-436
        • Nguyen M.D.
        • Chen C.
        • Colakoğlu S.
        • et al.
        Infectious complications leading to explantation in implant-based breast reconstruction with AlloDerm.
        Eplasty. 2010; 10: e48
        • Nahabedian M.Y.
        AlloDerm performance in the setting of prosthetic breast surgery, infection, and irradiation.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 1743-1753
        • Preminger B.A.
        • McCarthy C.M.
        • Hu Q.Y.
        • et al.
        The influence of AlloDerm on expander dynamics and complications in the setting of immediate tissue expander/implant reconstruction: a matched-cohort study.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2008; 60: 510-513
        • Sbitany H.
        • Sandeen S.N.
        • Amalfi A.N.
        • et al.
        Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 1735-1740
        • Spear S.L.
        • Sinkin J.C.
        • Al-Attar A.
        Porcine acellular dermal matrix (Strattice) in primary and revision cosmetic breast surgery.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 131: 1140-1148
        • Maxwell G.P.
        • Gabriel A.
        Use of the acellular dermal matrix in revisionary aesthetic breast surgery.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2009; 29: 485-493
        • Jansen L.A.
        • Macadam S.A.
        The use of AlloDerm in postmastectomy alloplastic breast reconstruction: part II. A cost analysis.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127: 2245-2254
        • Baldelli I.
        • Cardoni G.
        • Franchelli S.
        • et al.
        Implant-based breast reconstruction using a polyester mesh (Surgimesh-PET): a retrospective single-center study.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 137: 931E-939E
        • Meyer Ganz O.
        • Tobalem M.
        • Perneger T.
        • et al.
        Risks and benefits of using an absorbable mesh in one-stage immediate breast reconstruction: a comparative study.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 135: 498e-507e