Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.
Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Clinics in Plastic SurgeryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Cosmetic surgery national data bank statistics.2018 (Available at:) (Accessed December, 2019)
- The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery's cosmetic surgery national data bank: Statistics 2018.Aesthet Surg J. 2019; 39: 1-27
- Abdominoplasty: classic principles and technique.Clin Plast Surg. 2014; 41: 655-672
- Refinements in abdominoplasty: a critical outcomes analysis over a 20-year period.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126: 1063-1074
- Getting the best results in abdominoplasty: current advanced concepts.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 143: 628e-636e
- Evidenced-based approach to abdominoplasty update.Aesthet Surg J. 2019; 39: 628-642
- Evidence-based abdominoplasty review with body contouring algorithm.Aesthet Surg J. 2019; 39: 643-661
- A systematic review of outcomes of abdominoplasty.J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2012; 46: 139-144
- Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective.Value Health. 2007; 10: S125-S137
- A review of randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of hand held computers with paper methods for data collection.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006; 6: 23
- Measure once, cut twice--adding patient-reported outcome measures to the electronic health record for comparative effectiveness research.J Clin Epidemiol. 2013; 66: S12-S20
- Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial.J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34: 557-565
- Does providing feedback on patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review.Qual Life Res. 2013; 22: 2265-2278
- What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials.J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32: 1480-1501
- Measuring outcomes in plastic surgery: body image and quality of life in abdominoplasty patients.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 112 ([discussion: 626–7]): 619-625
- Aesthetic abdominoplasty has a positive impact on quality of life prospectively.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019; 72: 813-820
- Does abdominoplasty have a positive influence on quality of life, self-esteem, and emotional stability?.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129: 957e-962e
- Abdominoplasty improves quality of life, psychological distress, and eating disorder symptoms: a prospective study.Plast Surg Int. 2014; 2014: 197232
- The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes.J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63: 737-745
- Recommendations on the most suitable quality-of-life measurement instruments for bariatric and body contouring surgery: a systematic review.Obes Rev. 2018; 19: 1395-1411
- The BODY-Q: a patient-reported outcome instrument for weight loss and body contouring treatments.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016; 4: e679
- Further psychometric validation of the BODY-Q: ability to detect change following bariatric surgery weight gain and loss.Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017; 15: 227
- Using the BODY-Q to understand impact of weight loss, excess skin, and the need for body contouring following bariatric surgery.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 142: 77-86
- Assessing outcomes in body contouring.Clin Plast Surg. 2014; 41: 645-654
- Development of the BODY-Q chest module evaluating outcomes following chest contouring surgery.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 142: 1600-1608
- The BODY-Q stretch marks scale: a development and validation study.Aesthet Surg J. 2018; 38: 990-997
- Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria.Qual Life Res. 2002; 11: 193-205
- PRO development: rigorous qualitative research as the crucial foundation.Qual Life Res. 2010; 19: 1087-1096
- Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1--eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument.Value Health. 2011; 14: 967-977
- The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study.Qual Life Res. 2010; 19: 539-549
- Translation and cultural Adaptation of the BODY-Q into Italian.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144: 326e
- German linguistic validation of the BODY-Q: standardised PRO instrument after bariatric and bodycontouring surgery.Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2019; 51 ([in German]): 255-261
- Danish translation and linguistic validation of the BODY-Q: a description of the process.Eur J Plast Surg. 2017; 40: 29-38
- French translation and linguistic validation of a new patient reported outcome instrument: the BODY-Q: a description of the process.Psychiatr Danub. 2019; 31: 406-410
- Validation of the Finnish version of the BODY-Q patient-reported outcome instrument among patients who underwent abdominoplasty.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019; 72: 933-940
- Psychometric validation of the BODY-Q in Danish patients undergoing weight loss and body contouring surgery.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017; 5: e1529
- Implementing electronic patient-reported outcome measures in outpatient cosmetic surgery clinics: an exploratory qualitative study.Aesthet Surg J. 2019; 39: 687-695
Article info
Publication history
Published online: April 17, 2020
Footnotes
Funding: The qualitative phase (phase I) of the BODY-Q study was funded by a research grant received from the Plastic Surgery Foundation (120593). The international field-test was funded by a grant from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR). Dr A. Pusic received support through the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748. In addition, A. Klassen held a CIHR Mid-Career Award in Women’s Health.
Identification
Copyright
© 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
