Measuring Outcomes in Cosmetic Abdominoplasty

The BODY-Q
Published:April 17, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2020.03.003

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinics in Plastic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
        Cosmetic surgery national data bank statistics.
        2018 (Available at:) (Accessed December, 2019)
      1. The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery's cosmetic surgery national data bank: Statistics 2018.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2019; 39: 1-27
        • Matarasso A.
        • Matarasso D.M.
        • Matarasso E.J.
        Abdominoplasty: classic principles and technique.
        Clin Plast Surg. 2014; 41: 655-672
        • Trussler A.P.
        • Kurkjian T.J.
        • Hatef D.A.
        • et al.
        Refinements in abdominoplasty: a critical outcomes analysis over a 20-year period.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126: 1063-1074
        • Boudreault D.J.
        • Sieber D.A.
        Getting the best results in abdominoplasty: current advanced concepts.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 143: 628e-636e
        • Shestak K.C.
        • Rios L.
        • Pollock T.A.
        • et al.
        Evidenced-based approach to abdominoplasty update.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2019; 39: 628-642
        • Rosenfield L.K.
        • Davis C.R.
        Evidence-based abdominoplasty review with body contouring algorithm.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2019; 39: 643-661
        • Staalesen T.
        • Elander A.
        • Strandell A.
        • et al.
        A systematic review of outcomes of abdominoplasty.
        J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2012; 46: 139-144
        • Patrick D.L.
        • Burke L.B.
        • Powers J.H.
        • et al.
        Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective.
        Value Health. 2007; 10: S125-S137
        • Lane S.J.
        • Heddle N.M.
        • Arnold E.
        • et al.
        A review of randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of hand held computers with paper methods for data collection.
        BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006; 6: 23
        • Wu A.W.
        • Kharrazi H.
        • Boulware L.E.
        • et al.
        Measure once, cut twice--adding patient-reported outcome measures to the electronic health record for comparative effectiveness research.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2013; 66: S12-S20
        • Basch E.
        • Deal A.M.
        • Kris M.G.
        • et al.
        Symptom monitoring with patient-reported outcomes during routine cancer treatment: a randomized controlled trial.
        J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34: 557-565
        • Boyce M.B.
        • Browne J.P.
        Does providing feedback on patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review.
        Qual Life Res. 2013; 22: 2265-2278
        • Kotronoulas G.
        • Kearney N.
        • Maguire R.
        • et al.
        What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials.
        J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32: 1480-1501
        • Bolton M.A.
        • Pruzinsky T.
        • Cash T.F.
        • et al.
        Measuring outcomes in plastic surgery: body image and quality of life in abdominoplasty patients.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 112 ([discussion: 626–7]): 619-625
        • Papadopulos N.A.
        • Meier A.C.
        • Henrich G.
        • et al.
        Aesthetic abdominoplasty has a positive impact on quality of life prospectively.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019; 72: 813-820
        • Papadopulos N.A.
        • Staffler V.
        • Mirceva V.
        • et al.
        Does abdominoplasty have a positive influence on quality of life, self-esteem, and emotional stability?.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129: 957e-962e
        • Saariniemi K.M.
        • Salmi A.M.
        • Peltoniemi H.H.
        • et al.
        Abdominoplasty improves quality of life, psychological distress, and eating disorder symptoms: a prospective study.
        Plast Surg Int. 2014; 2014: 197232
        • Mokkink L.B.
        • Terwee C.B.
        • Patrick D.L.
        • et al.
        The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2010; 63: 737-745
        • de Vries C.E.E.
        • Kalff M.C.
        • Prinsen C.A.C.
        • et al.
        Recommendations on the most suitable quality-of-life measurement instruments for bariatric and body contouring surgery: a systematic review.
        Obes Rev. 2018; 19: 1395-1411
        • Klassen A.F.
        • Cano S.J.
        • Alderman A.
        • et al.
        The BODY-Q: a patient-reported outcome instrument for weight loss and body contouring treatments.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016; 4: e679
        • Klassen A.F.
        • Cano S.J.
        • Kaur M.
        • et al.
        Further psychometric validation of the BODY-Q: ability to detect change following bariatric surgery weight gain and loss.
        Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017; 15: 227
        • Klassen A.F.
        • Kaur M.
        • Breitkopf T.
        • et al.
        Using the BODY-Q to understand impact of weight loss, excess skin, and the need for body contouring following bariatric surgery.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 142: 77-86
        • Klassen A.F.
        • Cano S.J.
        • Scott A.
        • et al.
        Assessing outcomes in body contouring.
        Clin Plast Surg. 2014; 41: 645-654
        • Klassen A.F.
        • Kaur M.
        • Poulsen L.
        • et al.
        Development of the BODY-Q chest module evaluating outcomes following chest contouring surgery.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 142: 1600-1608
        • Poulsen L.
        • Pusic A.
        • Robson S.
        • et al.
        The BODY-Q stretch marks scale: a development and validation study.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2018; 38: 990-997
        • Aaronson N.
        • Alonso J.
        • Burnam A.
        • et al.
        Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria.
        Qual Life Res. 2002; 11: 193-205
        • Lasch K.E.
        • Marquis P.
        • Vigneux M.
        • et al.
        PRO development: rigorous qualitative research as the crucial foundation.
        Qual Life Res. 2010; 19: 1087-1096
        • Patrick D.L.
        • Burke L.B.
        • Gwaltney C.J.
        • et al.
        Content validity--establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: part 1--eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument.
        Value Health. 2011; 14: 967-977
        • Mokkink L.B.
        • Terwee C.B.
        • Patrick D.L.
        • et al.
        The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study.
        Qual Life Res. 2010; 19: 539-549
        • Barone M.
        • Cogliandro A.
        • Salzillo R.
        • et al.
        Translation and cultural Adaptation of the BODY-Q into Italian.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144: 326e
        • Hermann N.
        • Klassen A.
        • Luketina R.
        • et al.
        German linguistic validation of the BODY-Q: standardised PRO instrument after bariatric and bodycontouring surgery.
        Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2019; 51 ([in German]): 255-261
        • Poulsen L.
        • Rose M.
        • Klassen A.
        • et al.
        Danish translation and linguistic validation of the BODY-Q: a description of the process.
        Eur J Plast Surg. 2017; 40: 29-38
        • Rillon P.
        • Chateau F.
        • Klassen A.
        • et al.
        French translation and linguistic validation of a new patient reported outcome instrument: the BODY-Q: a description of the process.
        Psychiatr Danub. 2019; 31: 406-410
        • Repo J.P.
        • Homsy P.
        • Uimonen M.M.
        • et al.
        Validation of the Finnish version of the BODY-Q patient-reported outcome instrument among patients who underwent abdominoplasty.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019; 72: 933-940
        • Poulsen L.
        • Klassen A.
        • Rose M.
        • et al.
        Psychometric validation of the BODY-Q in Danish patients undergoing weight loss and body contouring surgery.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017; 5: e1529
        • Kaur M.
        • Pusic A.
        • Gibbons C.
        • et al.
        Implementing electronic patient-reported outcome measures in outpatient cosmetic surgery clinics: an exploratory qualitative study.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2019; 39: 687-695