Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.
Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Clinics in Plastic SurgeryAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Plastic surgery statistics report.(Available at:) (Accessed February 20, 2022)
- Prepectoral breast reconstruction: the breast surgeon's perspective.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 140: 43S-48S
- The oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy - a Swedish matched cohort study.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014; 40: 1209-1215
- Nipple areola complex sparing mastectomy.Gland Surg. 2015; 4: 528-540
- The biology and evolution of cohesive gel and shaped implants.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 134: 6S-11S
- How to diagnose and treat breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 141: 586e-599e
- Theories of etiopathogenesis of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 143: 23S-29S
- An 8-year experience of direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm).Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127: 514-524
- Breast in a day": examining single-stage immediate, permanent implant reconstruction in nipple-sparing mastectomy.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 138: 184e-191e
- Important considerations for performing prepectoral breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 140: 7S-13S
- Towards patient-centered decision-making in breast cancer surgery: machine learning to predict individual patient-reported outcomes at 1-year follow-up.Ann Surg. 2021; (Online ahead of print)https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004862
- Patterns and correlates of knowledge, communication, and receipt of breast reconstruction in a modern population-based cohort of patients with breast cancer.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144: 303-313
- How informed is the decision about breast reconstruction after mastectomy?: a prospective, cross-sectional study.Ann Surg. 2016; 264: 1103-1109
- Anatomy of the breast fascial system: a systematic review of the literature.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022; 149: 28-40
- Anatomy of the superficial fascia system of the breast: a comprehensive theory of breast fascial anatomy.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 142: 1135-1144
- Optimizing outcomes in nipple-sparing mastectomy: mastectomy flap thickness is not one size fits all.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019; 7: e2103
- Mastectomy flap thickness and complications in nipple-sparing mastectomy: objective evaluation using magnetic resonance imaging.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017; 5: e1439
- What is in a number? Evaluating a risk assessment tool in immediate breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019; 7: e2585
- Postmastectomy reconstruction outcomes after intraoperative evaluation with indocyanine green angiography versus clinical assessment.Ann Surg Oncol. 2016; 23: 4080-4085
- Tumor-to-Nipple distance as a predictor of nipple involvement: expanding the inclusion criteria for nipple-sparing mastectomy.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 140: 1e-8e
- Recurrence outcomes after nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction in patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ.Ann Surg Oncol. 2020; 27: 1627-1635
- Oncologic trends, outcomes, and risk factors for locoregional recurrence: an analysis of tumor-to-nipple distance and critical factors in therapeutic nipple-sparing mastectomy.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 143: 1575-1585
- Is there a preferred incision location for nipple-sparing mastectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 143: 906e-919e
- Clinical outcomes following nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction: a 12-year experience with an analysis of patient and breast-related factors for complications.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013; 140: 545-555
- Incision choices in nipple-sparing mastectomy: a comparative analysis of outcomes and evolution of a clinical algorithm.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 142: 826e-835e
- Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: predictors of complications, reconstruction outcomes, and 5-year trends.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 133: 496-506
- Oncological and surgical outcomes after nipple-sparing mastectomy: do incisions matter?.Ann Surg Oncol. 2016; 23: 3226-3231
- Predicting complications following expander/implant breast reconstruction: an outcomes analysis based on preoperative clinical risk.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 121: 1886-1892
- Skin flap necrosis after mastectomy with reconstruction: a prospective study.Ann Surg Oncol. 2016; 23: 257-264
- Comparing therapeutic versus prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy: does indication inform oncologic and reconstructive outcomes?.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 142: 306-315
- Comparison of outcomes with tissue expander, immediate implant, and autologous breast reconstruction in greater than 1000 nipple-sparing mastectomies.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 139: 1300-1310
- Putting together the pieces: development and validation of a risk-assessment model for nipple-sparing mastectomy.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 145: 273e-283e
- Risk of developing breast reconstruction complications: a machine-learning nomogram for individualized risk estimation with and without postmastectomy radiation therapy.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022; 149: 1e-12e
- The impact of mastectomy weight on reconstructive trends and outcomes in nipple-sparing mastectomy: progressively greater complications with larger breast size.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 141: 795e-804e
- Outcome evaluation after 2023 nipple-sparing mastectomies: our experience.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 139: 335e-347e
- Nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with a history of reduction mammaplasty or mastopexy: how safe is it?.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 131: 962-967
- Breast reconstruction using a staged nipple-sparing mastectomy following mastopexy or reduction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129: 572-581
- Does staged breast reduction before nipple-sparing mastectomy decrease complications? A matched cohort study between staged and nonstaged techniques.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144: 1023-1032
- Primary buttonhole mastopexy and nipple-sparing mastectomy: a preliminary report.Ann Plast Surg. 2016; 77: 388-395
- The "smile mastopexy": a novel technique to aesthetically address the excess skin envelope in large, ptotic breasts while preserving nipple areolar complex during prosthetic breast reconstruction.Aesthet Surg J. 2022; 42: NP393-NP403
- Skin-reducing mastectomy with immediate prepectoral reconstruction: surgical, aesthetic, and patient-reported outcomes with and without dermal matrices.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021; 147: 1046-1057
- Direct-to-Implant breast reconstruction with simultaneous nipple-sparing mastopexy utilizing an inferiorly based adipodermal flap: our experience with prepectoral and subpectoral techniques.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 145: 1125-1133
- Surgical outcomes of prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction in young women.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019; 7: e2119
- Pushing the envelope: skin-only mastopexy in single-stage nipple-sparing mastectomy with direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021; 147: 38-45
- Clinical results on innovation in breast implant design.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 142: 31S-38S
- Cohesive implants in revisionary breast reconstruction: strategies for optimizing aesthetic outcomes.Ann Breast Surg. 2020; 4
- Improved long-term outcomes after heart transplantation utilizing donors with a traumatic mode of brain death.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019; 14: 138
- Optimizing outcomes in 2-stage prepectoral breast reconstruction utilizing round form-stable implants.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144: 43S-50S
- Shaped versus round implants in breast reconstruction: a multi-institutional comparison of surgical and patient-reported outcomes.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 139: 1063-1070
- Patient-reported satisfaction and health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction: a comparison of shaped cohesive gel and round cohesive gel implant recipients.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 131: 431-441
- Breast implants.(Available at:) (Accessed March 12, 2022)
- Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128: 403e-410e
- Systematic review of the impact of acellular dermal matrix on aesthetics and patient satisfaction in tissue expander-to-implant breast reconstructions.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144: 967e-974e
- Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 1735-1740
- Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systematic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128: 1162-1169
- The use of acellular dermal matrices in two-stage expander/implant reconstruction: a multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trial.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 130: 57S-66S
- The use of acellular dermal matrix to prevent capsule formation around implants in a primate model.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 82-91
- Acellular cadaveric dermis decreases the inflammatory response in capsule formation in reconstructive breast surgery.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126: 1842-1847
- Acellular dermal matrix reduces myofibroblast presence in the breast capsule.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019; 7: e2213
- Introduction to "prepectoral breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 140: 4S-5S
- The effect of AlloDerm envelopes on periprosthetic capsule formation with and without radiation.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 123: 807-816
- Immediate implant-based breast reconstruction following total skin-sparing mastectomy: defining the risk of preoperative and postoperative radiation therapy for surgical outcomes.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 134: 396-404
- Total muscle coverage versus AlloDerm human dermal matrix for implant-based breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 143: 1-6
- The use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129: 1049-1058
- Sterile "ready-to-use" AlloDerm decreases postoperative infectious complications in patients undergoing immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 132: 725-736
- A meta-analysis of postoperative complications of tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix.Aesthet Plast Surg. 2015; 39: 892-901
- Updated evidence of acellular dermal matrix use for implant-based breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis.Ann Surg Oncol. 2016; 23: 600-610
- Cost analysis of implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix.Ann Plast Surg. 2012; 69: 516-520
- Vicryl mesh in expander/implant breast reconstruction: long-term follow-up in 38 patients.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 134: 892-899
- Risks and benefits of using an absorbable mesh in one-stage immediate breast reconstruction: a comparative study.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 135: 498e-507e
- Beyond biologics: absorbable mesh as a low-cost, low-complication sling for implant-based breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014; 133: 90e-99e
- Implant-based breast reconstruction using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP Bra): a multicenter study of 231 cases.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 132: 8e-19e
- Mesh versus acellular dermal matrix in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction - a prospective randomized trial.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016; 42: 665-671
- Technique refinement in prepectoral implant breast reconstruction with vicryl mesh pocket and acellular dermal matrix support.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018; 6: e1749
- Splitting the difference: using synthetic and biologic mesh to decrease cost in prepectoral immediate implant breast reconstruction.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021; 147: 580-584
- Staged suprapectoral expander/implant reconstruction without acellular dermal matrix following nipple-sparing mastectomy.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 139: 30-39
- Do we need support in prepectoral breast reconstruction? Comparing outcomes with and without ADM.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021; 9: e3745
- Prepectoral two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix: do we see a difference?.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 145: 263e-272e
- Acellular dermal matrix-sparing direct-to-implant prepectoral breast reconstruction: a comparative study including cost analysis.Ann Plast Surg. 2020; 84: 139-143
- Review of outcomes in prepectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction with and without surgical mesh assistance.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021; 147: 305-315
- Committee USFaDAGaPSDPotMDA.(Available at:) (Accessed February 20, 2022)
- Early multicentre experience of pre-pectoral implant based immediate breast reconstruction using Braxon((R)).Gland Surg. 2017; 6: 682-688
- Prepectoral immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with anterior AlloDerm coverage.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 140 (Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction)): 31S-38S
- Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015; 68: 162-167
- Immediate implant-based prepectoral breast reconstruction using a vertical incision.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015; 3: e412
Article info
Publication history
Published online: January 02, 2023
Identification
Copyright
© 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
