Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 50, ISSUE 2, P235-242, April 2023

Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction

Published:January 02, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2022.09.004

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinics in Plastic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • American Society of Plastic Surgeons
        2020 plastic surgery procedural statistics.
        • Sbitany H.
        • Amalfi A.N.
        • Langstein H.N.
        Preferences in choosing between breast reconstruction options: a survey of female plastic surgeons.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 1781-1789
        • Wang F.
        • Peled A.W.
        • Garwood E.
        • et al.
        Total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an evolution of technique and assessment of outcomes.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2014; 21: 3223-3230
        • Becker H.
        • Lind 2nd, J.G.
        • Hopkins E.G.
        Immediate implant-based prepectoral breast reconstruction using a vertical incision.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015; 3: e412
        • Sigalove S.
        • Maxwell G.P.
        • Sigalove N.M.
        • et al.
        Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: rationale, indications, and preliminary results.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 139: 287-294
        • Sbitany H.
        • Piper M.
        • Lentz R.
        Prepectoral breast reconstruction: a safe alternative to submuscular prosthetic reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 140: 432-443
        • Srinivasa D.R.
        • Holland M.
        • Sbitany H.
        Optimizing perioperative strategies to maximize success with prepectoral breast reconstruction.
        Gland Surg. 2019; 8: 19-26
        • Sbitany H.
        Important considerations for performing prepectoral breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 140: 7s-13s
        • Bettinger L.N.
        • Waters L.M.
        • Reese S.W.
        • et al.
        Comparative study of prepectoral and subpectoral expander-based breast reconstruction and clavien IIIb score outcomes.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017; 5: e1433
        • Graziano F.D.
        • Shay P.L.
        • Sanati-Mehrizy P.
        • et al.
        Prepectoral implant reconstruction in the setting of post- mastectomy radiation.
        Gland Surg. 2020; 10: 411-416
        • Sbitany H.
        • Gomez-Sanchez C.
        • Piper M.
        • et al.
        Prepectoral breast reconstruction in the setting of postmastectomy radiation therapy: an assessment of clinical outcomes and benefits.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 143: 10-20
        • Sigalove S.
        Prepectoral breast reconstruction and radiotherapy-a closer look.
        Gland Surg. 2019; 8: 67-74
        • Sinnott C.J.
        • Persing S.M.
        • Pronovost M.
        • et al.
        Impact of postmastectomy radiation therapy in prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2018; 25: 2899-2908
        • Vidya R.
        • Berna G.
        • Sbitany H.
        • et al.
        Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: a joint consensus guide from UK, European and USA breast and plastic reconstructive surgeons.
        Ecancermedicalscience. 2019; 13: 927
        • Buchanan C.L.
        • Dorn P.L.
        • Fey J.
        • et al.
        Locoregional recurrence after mastectomy: incidence and outcomes.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2006; 203: 469-474
        • Mohamed M.M.
        • Al-Raawi D.
        • Sabet S.F.
        • et al.
        Inflammatory breast cancer: new factors contribute to disease etiology: a review.
        J Adv Res. 2014; 5: 525-536
        • Hart A.
        • Desai K.
        • Yoo J.
        • et al.
        Incidence of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrier status in patients undergoing post-mastectomy breast reconstruction.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2017; 37: 35-43
        • Robertson S.A.
        • Rusby J.E.
        • Cutress R.I.
        Determinants of optimal mastectomy skin flap thickness.
        Br J Surg. 2014; 101: 899-911
        • Sbitany H.
        • Wang F.
        • Peled A.W.
        • et al.
        Tissue expander reconstruction after total skin-sparing mastectomy: defining the effects of coverage technique on nipple/areola preservation.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2016; 77: 17-24
        • Phillips B.T.
        • Lanier S.T.
        • Conkling N.
        • et al.
        Intraoperative perfusion techniques can accurately predict mastectomy skin flap necrosis in breast reconstruction: results of a prospective trial.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129: 778e-788e
        • Mazdeyasna S.
        • Huang C.
        • Bonaroti A.R.
        • et al.
        Intraoperative optical and fluorescence imaging of blood flow distributions in mastectomy skin flaps for identifying ischemic tissues.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022; 150: 282-287
        • Pruimboom T.
        • Schols R.M.
        • Van Kuijk S.M.
        • et al.
        Indocyanine green angiography for preventing postoperative mastectomy skin flap necrosis in immediate breast reconstruction.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 4: Cd013280
        • Mattison G.L.
        • Lewis P.G.
        • Gupta S.C.
        • et al.
        SPY imaging use in postmastectomy breast reconstruction patients: preventative or overly conservative?.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 138: 15e-21e
        • Johnson A.C.
        • Colakoglu S.
        • Siddikoglu D.
        • et al.
        Impact of dermal matrix brand in implant-based breast reconstruction outcomes.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022; 150: 17-25
        • Snyderman R.K.
        • Guthrie R.H.
        Reconstruction of the female breast following radical mastectomy.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971; 47: 565-567
        • Basu C.B.
        • Jeffers L.
        The role of acellular dermal matrices in capsular contracture: a review of the evidence.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 130: 118s-124s
        • Sbitany H.
        • Sandeen S.N.
        • Amalfi A.N.
        • et al.
        Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 1735-1740
        • Colwell A.S.
        • Damjanovic B.
        • Zahedi B.
        • et al.
        Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 128: 1170-1178
        • Rose J.F.
        • Zafar S.N.
        • Ellsworth Iv W.A.
        Does acellular dermal matrix thickness affect complication rate in tissue expander based breast reconstruction?.
        Plast Surg Int. 2016; 2016: 2867097
        • Hur J.
        • Han H.H.
        Outcome assessment according to the thickness and direction of the acellular dermal matrix after implant-based breast reconstruction.
        Biomed Res Int. 2021; 2021: 8101009
        • Gui G.
        • Gui M.
        • Gui A.
        • et al.
        Physical characteristics of surgimend meshed biological ADM in immediate prepectoral implant breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022; 10: e4369
        • Tierney B.P.
        • De La Garza M.
        • Jennings G.R.
        • et al.
        Clinical outcomes of acellular dermal matrix (simpliderm and alloderm ready-to-use) in immediate breast reconstruction.
        Cureus. 2022; 14: e22371
        • Khan A.
        • Tasoulis M.K.
        • Teoh V.
        • et al.
        Pre-pectoral one-stage breast reconstruction with anterior biological acellular dermal matrix coverage.
        Gland Surg. 2021; 10: 1002-1009
        • Ho G.
        • Nguyen T.J.
        • Shahabi A.
        • et al.
        A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications associated with acellular dermal matrix-assisted breast reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2012; 68: 346-356
        • Lee K.T.
        • Mun G.H.
        A meta-analysis of studies comparing outcomes of diverse acellular dermal matrices for implant-based breast reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2017; 79: 115-123
        • Maisel Lotan A.
        • Ben Yehuda D.
        • Allweis T.M.
        • et al.
        Comparative study of meshed and nonmeshed acellular dermal matrix in immediate breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144: 1045-1053
        • Safran T.
        • Al-Badarin F.
        • Al-Halabi B.
        • et al.
        Aesthetic limitations in direct-to-implant prepectoral breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022; 150: 22e-31e
        • Nahabedian M.Y.
        • Glasberg S.B.
        • Maxwell G.P.
        Introduction to "prepectoral breast reconstruction".
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 140: 4s-5s
        • Spear S.L.
        • Coles C.N.
        • Leung B.K.
        • et al.
        The safety, effectiveness, and efficiency of autologous fat grafting in breast surgery.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016; 4: e827
        • Goodreau A.M.
        • Driscoll C.R.
        • Nye A.
        • et al.
        Revising prepectoral breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022; 149: 579-584
        • Weichman K.E.
        • Clavin N.W.
        • Miller H.C.
        • et al.
        Does the use of biopatch devices at drain sites reduce perioperative infectious complications in patients undergoing immediate tissue expander breast reconstruction?.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 135: 9e-17e
        • Baker B.G.
        • Irri R.
        • MacCallum V.
        • et al.
        A prospective comparison of short-term outcomes of subpectoral and prepectoral strattice-based immediate breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 141: 1077-1084
        • Bennett K.G.
        • Qi J.
        • Kim H.M.
        • et al.
        Comparison of 2-year complication rates among common techniques for postmastectomy breast reconstruction.
        JAMA Surg. 2018; 153: 901-908