Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 50, ISSUE 2, P201-210, April 2023

Preoperative Assessment of the Breast Reconstruction Patient

Published:January 25, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2022.10.002

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinics in Plastic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • American Cancer Society
        Breast cancer facts & figures 2017–2018.
        (Available at:) (Accessed Oct 17,2019)
        • Wendt C.
        • Margolin S.
        Identifying breast cancer susceptibility genes – a review of the genetic background in familial breast cancer.
        Acta Oncol. 2019; 58: 135
        • Avis N.E.
        • Crawford S.
        • Manuel J.
        Quality of life among younger women with breast cancer.
        J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 3322
        • Nissen M.J.
        • Swensin K.K.
        • Ritz L.J.
        • et al.
        Quality of life after breast carcinoma surgery: a comparison of three surgical procedures.
        Cancer. 2001; 91: 1238
        • Weitzner M.A.
        • Meyers C.A.
        • Stuebing K.K.
        • et al.
        Relationship between quality of life and mood in long-term survivors of breast cancer treated with mastectomy.
        Support Care Cancer. 1997; 5: 241
        • Ray C.
        Psychological implications of mastectomy.
        Br J Soc Clin Psychol. 1977; 16: 373
        • Türk K.E.
        • Yilmaz M.
        The effect on quality of life and body image of mastectomy among breast cancer survivors.
        Eur J Breast Health. 2018; 14: 205
        • Neto M.S.
        • de Aguiar Menezes M.V.
        • Moreira J.R.
        • et al.
        Sexuality after breast reconstruction post mastectomy.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013; 37: 643
        • Metcalfe K.A.
        • Semple J.
        • Quan M.L.
        • et al.
        Changes in psychosocial functioning 1 year after mastectomy alone, delayed breast reconstruction, or immediate breast reconstruction.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2012; 19: 233
        • Al-Ghazal S.K.
        • Sully L.
        • Fallowfield L.
        • et al.
        The psychological impact of immediate rather than delayed breast reconstruction.
        Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000; 26: 17
        • Wilkins E.G.
        • Cederna P.S.
        • Lowery J.C.
        • et al.
        Prospective analysis of psychological outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 106: 1014
        • Elder E.E.
        • Branberg Y.
        • Björklund T.
        • et al.
        Quality of life and patient satisfaction in breast cancer patients after immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study.
        Breast. 2005; 14: 201
        • Ochoa O.
        • Garza III, R.
        • Pisano S.
        • et al.
        Prospective longitudinal patient reported satisfaction and health-related quality of life following DIEP flap breast reconstruction: effects of reconstruction timing.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022; 149: 848e
        • Kesson E.M.
        • Allardice G.M.
        • George W.D.
        • et al.
        Effects of multidisciplinary team working on breast cancer survival: retrospective, comparative, interventional cohort study of 13,722 women.
        BMJ. 2012; 344: e2718
        • Pusic A.L.
        • Klassen A.F.
        • Scott A.M.
        • et al.
        Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the Breast-Q.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 345
        • Cohen W.A.
        • Mundy L.R.
        • Ballard T.N.
        • et al.
        The Breast-Q in surgical research: a review of the literature 2009-2015.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016; 69: 149
        • Shinkunas L.A.
        • Klipowicz C.J.
        • Carlisle E.M.
        Shared decision-making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences.
        BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020; 20: 190
        • Zhong T.
        • McCrathy C.
        • Min S.
        • et al.
        Patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life after autologous tissue breast reconstruction: a prospective analysis of early postoperative outcomes.
        Cancer. 2012; 118: 1701
        • Andrade W.N.
        • Baxter N.
        • Semple J.L.
        Clinical determinants of patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 107: 46
        • Colakoglu S.
        • Khansa I.
        • Curtis M.S.
        • et al.
        Impact of complications on patient satisfaction in breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127: 1428
        • Gopie J.P.
        • Timman R.
        • Hilhorst M.T.
        • et al.
        The short-term psychological impact of complications after breast reconstruction.
        Psychooncology. 2013; 22: 290
        • Dinwoodie M.
        Consent and shared decision-making.
        (Available at:) (Accessed June 1, 2022)
        • Lee C.N.
        • Deal A.M.
        • Huh R.
        • et al.
        Quality of patient decisions about breast reconstruction after mastectomy.
        JAMA Surg. 2017; 152: 741
      1. The SHARE approach. In: Agency for Health care research and quality, Rockville, MD.
        (Available at:) (Accessed June 1, 2022)
        • Zdenkowski N.
        • Butow P.
        • Tesson S.
        • et al.
        A systematic review of decision aids for patients making a decision about treatment for early breast cancer.
        Breast. 2016; 26: 31
        • Berlin N.L.
        • Tandon V.J.
        • Hawley S.T.
        • et al.
        Feasibility and efficacy of decision aids to improve decision-making for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Med Decis Making. 2019; 39: 5
        • Torabi R.
        • Stalder M.W.
        • Tessler O.
        • et al.
        Assessing age as a risk factor for complications in autologous breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 142: 840e
        • Hamnett K.E.
        • Subramanian A.
        Breast reconstruction in older patients: a literature review of the decision-making process.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016; 69: 1325
        • Liu Q.
        • Aggarwal A.
        • Wu M.
        • et al.
        Impact of diabetes on outcomes in breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022; 15: 29
        • Avci B.S.
        • Saler T.
        • Avci A.
        • et al.
        Relationship between morbidity and mortality and HbA1c levels in diabetic patients undergoing major surgery.
        J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019; 29: 1043
        • Wang T.Y.
        • Serletti J.M.
        • Cuker A.
        • et al.
        Free tissue transfer in the hypercoagulable patient: a review of 58 flaps.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129: 443
        • Rohrich R.J.
        • Kaplan J.
        • Dayan E.
        Silicone implant illness: science versus myth?.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144: 98
        • Magnusson M.R.
        • Cooter R.D.
        • Rakhorst H.
        • et al.
        Breast implant illness: a way forward.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 143: 74S
        • Rubio G.A.
        • McGee C.S.
        • Thaller S.R.
        Autologous breast reconstruction outcomes in patients with autoimmune connective tissue disease.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019; 72: 848
        • O’Neill A.C.
        • Haykal S.
        • Bagher S.
        • et al.
        Predictors and consequences of intraoperative microvascular problems in autologous breast reconstruction.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016; 69: 1349
        • Ochoa O.
        • Chrysopoulo M.
        • Nastala C.
        • et al.
        Abdominal wall stability and flap complications after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: does body mass index make a difference? Analysis of 418 patients and 639 flaps.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 130: 21e
        • NCCN
        NCCN (clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer) version 3.2022.
        (Available at:) (Accessed May 11, 2022)
        • Cooke A.L.
        • Diaz-Abele J.
        • Hayakawa T.
        • et al.
        Radiation therapy versus No radiation therapy to the neo-breast following skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous free flap reconstruction for breast cancer: patient-reported and surgical outcomes at 1 Year-A mastectomy reconstruction outcomes consortium (MROC) substudy.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017; 99: 165
        • Jabor M.A.
        • Shayani P.
        • Collins Jr., D.R.
        • et al.
        Nipple-areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 110: 457
        • Daar D.A.
        • Abdou S.A.
        • Rosario L.
        • et al.
        Is there a preferred incision location for nipple-sparing mastectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 143: 906e
        • Ochoa O.
        • Azouz V.
        • Santillan A.
        • et al.
        Internal mammary lymph node biopsy during free-flap breast reconstruction: optimizing adjuvant breast cancer treatment through comprehensive staging.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2018; 25: 1322
        • Schultz B.D.
        • Sultan D.
        • Ha G.
        • et al.
        Internal mammary lymph node biopsy during microsurgical breast reconstruction: a prospective study.
        J Reconstr Microsurg. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1744503
        • Karanetz I.
        • Jin M.
        • Nguyen K.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of internal mammary lymph node biopsy during microsurgical breast reconstruction: an analysis of 230 consecutive patients.
        Breast J. 2021; 27: 7
        • Varghese J.
        • Gohari S.S.
        • Rizki H.
        • et al.
        A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on complications following immediate breast reconstruction.
        Breast. 2021; 55: 55
        • Yoo T.
        • Moon H.
        • Han W.
        • et al.
        Time interval of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to surgery in breast cancer: how long is acceptable?.
        Gland Surg. 2017; 6: 1
        • Sanford R.A.
        • Lei X.
        • Barcenas C.H.
        • et al.
        Impact of time from completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to surgery on survival outcomes in breast cancer patients.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2016; 23: 1515
        • Al-Masri M.
        • Aljalabneh B.
        • Al-Najjar H.
        • et al.
        Effect of time to breast cancer surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy on survival outcomes.
        Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021; 186: 7
        • Suleman K.
        • Almalik O.
        • Haque E.
        • al at
        Does the timing of breast surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients affect outcomes?.
        Oncology. 2020; 98: 168
        • Kooijman M.M.
        • Hage J.J.
        • Oldenberg H.A.S.
        • et al.
        Surgical complications of skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate implant-based reconstruction in women concurrently treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2021; 86: 146
        • Jimenez-Puente A.
        • Prieto-Lara E.
        • Rueda-Dominguez A.
        • et al.
        Complications in immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy.
        Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011; 27: 298
        • Ravdin P.M.
        • Chamness G.C.
        The c-erbb-2 proto-oncogene as a prognostic and predictive marker in breast cancer: a paradigm for the development of other macromolecular markers – a review.
        Gene. 1995; 159: 19
        • Shammas R.L.
        • Cho E.H.
        • Glener A.D.
        • et al.
        Association between targeted HER-2 therapy and breast reconstruction outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2017; 225: 731
        • Kelley B.P.
        • Valero V.
        • Yi M.
        • et al.
        Tamoxifen increases the risk of microvascular flap complications in patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129: 305
        • Mirzabeigi M.N.
        • Nelson J.A.
        • Fischer J.P.
        • et al.
        Tamoxifen (selective estrogen-receptor modulators) and aromatase inhibitors as potential perioperative thrombotic risk factors in free flap breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 135: 670e
        • Hirsch E.M.
        • Seth A.K.
        • Dumanian G.A.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction in the setting of prereconstruction radiation.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129: 354
        • Olinger T.A.
        • Berlin N.L.
        • Qi J.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of immediate implant-based mastectomy reconstruction in women with previous breast radiotherapy.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 145: 1029e
        • Jo T.
        • Hur K.
        • Min K.
        • et al.
        Immediate breast reconstruction after salvage mastectomy: case control outcome comparisons of DIEP flap and DTI reconstruction.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2021; 74: 1495
        • Khajuria A.
        • Charles W.N.
        • Prokopenko M.
        • et al.
        Immediate and delayed autologous abdominal microvascular flap breast reconstruction in patients receiving adjuvant, neoadjuvant, or no radiotherapy: a meta-analysis of clinical and quality of life outcomes.
        BJS Open. 2020; 4: 182
        • Momoh A.O.
        • Colakoglu S.
        • De blacam C.
        • et al.
        Delayed autologous breast reconstruction after postmastectomy radiation: is there an optimal time?.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2012; 69: 14
        • Baumann D.P.
        • Crosby M.A.
        • Selber J.C.
        • et al.
        Optimal timing of delayed free lower abdominal flap breast reconstruction after postmastectomy radiation therapy.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127: 1100
        • Ryan J.L.
        Ionizing radiation: the good, the bad, and the ugly.
        J Invest Dermatol. 2012; 132: 985
        • Agarwal S.
        • Kidwell K.M.
        • Farberg A.
        • et al.
        Immediate reconstruction of the radiated breast – recent trends contrary to traditional standards.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2015; 22: 2551
        • Kronowitz S.J.
        • Robb G.L.
        Radiation therapy and breast reconstruction: a critical review of the literature.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 395
        • Fowble B.
        • Park C.
        • Wang F.
        • et al.
        Rates of reconstructive failure in patients undergoing immediate reconstruction with tissue expanders and/or implants and postmastectomy radiation therapy.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015; 92: 634
        • Billig J.
        • Jagsi R.
        • Qi J.
        • et al.
        Should immediate autologous breast reconstruction considered in women who require post-mastectomy radiation therapy? A prospective analysis of outcomes.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 139: 1279
        • Anderson P.R.
        • Hanlon A.L.
        • Fowble B.L.
        • et al.
        Low complication rates are achievable after postmastectomy breast reconstruction and radiation therapy.
        Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004; 59: 1080
        • Heller D.R.
        • Zhuo H.
        • Zhang Y.
        • et al.
        Surgical outcomes of mastectomy with immediate autologous reconstruction followed by radiation.
        Ann Surg Oncol. 2021; 28: 2169
        • Kronowitz S.J.
        • Hunt K.K.
        • Kuerer H.M.
        • et al.
        Delayed-immediate breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 113: 1617
        • Terao Y.
        • Taniguchi K.
        • Fugii M.
        • et al.
        Postmastectomy radiation therapy and breast reconstruction with autologous tissue.
        Breast Cancer. 2017; 24: 505
        • American Society of Plastic Surgeons
        2019 plastic surgery statistics report.
        American Society of Plastic Surgeons, Arlington Heights (IL)2019 (Available at:) (Accessed May 22, 2022)
        • Sbitany H.
        • Sandeen S.N.
        • Amalfi A.N.
        • et al.
        Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 1735
        • Leong M.
        • Basu B.
        • Hicks M.J.
        Further evidence that human acellular matrix decreases inflammatory markers of capsule formation in implant-based breast reconstruction.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2015; 35: 40
        • Yazar S.
        • Bengur F.B.
        • Altinkaya A.
        • et al.
        Nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate implant-based reconstruction with or without skin reduction in patients with large ptotic breasts: a case matched analysis.
        Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021; 45: 956
        • Salibian A.H.
        • Harness J.K.
        • Mowlds D.S.
        Secondary mastopexy after nipple-sparing mastectomy and staged subcutaneous expander/implant reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2018; 80: 475
        • Sbitany H.
        Important considerations for performing prepectoral breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 140: 7S
        • Elswick S.M.
        • Harless C.A.
        • Bishop S.N.
        • et al.
        Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with postmastectomy radiation therapy.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 142: 1
        • Safran T.
        • Al-Badarin F.
        • Al-Halabi B.
        • et al.
        Aesthetic limitations in direct-to-implant prepectoral implant reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022; https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000009189
        • DellaCroce F.J.
        • Blum C.A.
        • Sullivan S.K.
        • et al.
        Nipple-sparing mastectomy and ptosis: perforator flap breast reconstruction allows full secondary mastopexy with complete nipple areolar repositioning.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 136: 1e
        • Allen R.J.
        • Treece P.
        Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1994; 32: 32
        • Haddock N.T.
        • Cho M.
        • Teotia S.S.
        Comparative analysis of single versus stacked free flap breast reconstruction: a single-center experience.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144: 369e
        • DellaCroce F.J.
        • Sullivan S.K.
        • Trahan C.
        Stacked deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: a review of 110 flaps in 55 cases over 3 years.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127: 1093
        • Daly L.T.
        • Doval A.F.
        • Lin S.J.
        • et al.
        Role of CTA in women with abdominal scars undergoing DIEP breast reconstruction: review of 1,187 flaps.
        J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020; 36: 294
        • Rozen W.M.
        • Bhullar H.K.
        • Hunter-Smith D.
        How to assess a CTA of the abdomen to plan an autologous breast reconstruction.
        Gland Surg. 2019; 8: S291
        • Mauch J.T.
        • Rhemtulla I.A.
        • Katzel E.B.
        • et al.
        Does size matter: evaluating the difference between right and left internal mammary veins in free flap breast reconstruction.
        J Reconstr Microsurg. 2019; 35: 677
        • Moran S.L.
        • Nava G.
        • Benham A.H.
        • et al.
        An outcome analysis comparing the thoracodorsal and internal mammary vessels as recipient sites for microvascular breast reconstruction: a prospective study of 100 patients.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003; 111: 1876
        • Casey W.J.
        • Rebecca A.M.
        • Smith A.A.
        • et al.
        The cephalic and external jugular veins: important alternative recipient vessels in left-sided microvascular breast reconstruction.
        Microsurgery. 2007; 27: 465