Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 50, ISSUE 2, P337-346, April 2023

Hybrid Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction:

HyFIL® & HyPAD™ Techniques
  • Neil Tanna
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwell Health, 600 Northern Blvd., Suite 310, Great Neck, NY 11021.
    Affiliations
    Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwell Health, Great Neck, NY, USA

    Divsion of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, The Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Sarah L. Barnett
    Affiliations
    Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwell Health, Great Neck, NY, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Emma L. Robinson
    Affiliations
    Divsion of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, The Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Mark L. Smith
    Affiliations
    Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwell Health, Great Neck, NY, USA

    Divsion of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, The Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
    Search for articles by this author

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinics in Plastic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Plastic surgery Statistics report.
        (Available at:) (Accessed May 18, 2022)
        • Chu M.
        • Samra F.
        • Kanchwala S.
        • et al.
        Treatment options for bilateral autologous breast reconstruction in patients with inadequate donor-site volume.
        J Reconstr Microsurgery. 2017; 33: 305-311https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1599074
        • Handel N.
        • Jensen J.A.
        • Black Q.
        • et al.
        The fate of breast implants.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995; 96: 1521-1533https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199512000-00003
        • Dieterich M.
        • Dragu A.
        • Stachs A.
        • et al.
        Clinical Approaches to breast reconstruction: what is the Appropriate reconstructive procedure for My patient.
        Breast Care. 2017; 12: 368-373https://doi.org/10.1159/000484926
        • Arnež Z.M.
        • Pogorelec D.
        • Planinšek F.
        • et al.
        Breast reconstruction by the free transverse gracilis (TUG) flap.
        Br J Plast Surg. 2004; 57: 20-26https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2003.10.007
        • Kind G.
        • Foster R.
        Breast reconstruction using the lateral Femoral Circumflex artery perforator flap.
        J Reconstr Microsurgery. 2011; 27: 427-432https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1281527
      2. Profunda artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction. In: Perforator flaps for breast reconstruction.
        Georg Thieme Verlag. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1055/b-0036-141879
        • LoTempio M.M.
        • Allen R.J.
        Breast reconstruction with SGAP and IGAP flaps.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126: 393-401https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3181de236a
        • Park J.E.
        • Alkureishi L.W.T.
        • Song D.H.
        TUGs into VUGs and Friendly BUGs.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 136: 447-454https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000001557
        • Stillaert F.B.J.L.
        • Lannau B.
        • Van Landuyt K.
        • et al.
        The pre-pectoral, hybrid breast reconstruction: the Synergy of lipofilling and breast implants.
        Plast Reconstr Surg - Glob Open. 2020; 8e2966https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000002966
        • Bennett K.G.
        • Qi J.
        • Kim H.M.
        • et al.
        Comparison of 2-Year complication rates Among common techniques for Postmastectomy breast reconstruction.
        JAMA Surg. 2018; 153: 901https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1687
        • Kanchwala S.K.
        • Glatt B.S.
        • Conant E.F.
        • et al.
        Autologous fat grafting to the reconstructed breast: the management of Acquired contour deformities.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 409-418https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3181aeeadd
        • Stalder M.W.
        • Lam J.
        • Allen R.J.
        • et al.
        Using the Retrograde internal Mammary System for stacked perforator flap breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 137: 265e-277e
        • Mayo J.L.
        • Allen R.J.
        • Sadeghi A.
        Four-flap breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg - Glob Open. 2015; 3: e383https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000000353
        • Blackburn N.E.
        • Mc Veigh J.G.
        • Mc Caughan E.
        • et al.
        The musculoskeletal consequences of breast reconstruction using the latissimus dorsi muscle for women following mastectomy for breast cancer: a critical review.
        Eur J Cancer Care. 2017; 27e12664https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12664
        • Momeni A.
        • Kanchwala S.
        Hybrid pre-pectoral breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 142: 1109-1115https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000004858
        • Kanchwala S.
        • Momeni A.
        Hybrid breast reconstruction—the best of both worlds.
        Gland Surg. 2019; 8: 82-89https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2018.11.01
        • Serletti J.M.
        • Moran S.L.
        The combined Use of the TRAM and Expanders/implants in breast reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1998; 40: 510-514https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199805000-00012
        • Roehl K.R.
        • Baumann D.P.
        • Chevray P.M.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of outcomes in breast reconstructions combining lower abdominal free flaps and permanent implants.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126: 349-357https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3181de1b67
        • Yesantharao P.S.
        • Nguyen D.H.
        Hybrid breast reconstruction: a systematic review of current trends and future directions.
        Ann Breast Surg. 2022; 6: 17https://doi.org/10.21037/abs-20-114
        • Handel N.
        • Cordray T.
        • Gutierrez J.
        • et al.
        A long-term Study of outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction with breast implants.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 117: 757-767https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000201457.00772.1d
        • Eppley B.
        Revascularization of acellular human dermis (alloderm) in subcutaneous implantation.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2000; 20: 291-295https://doi.org/10.1067/maj.2000.109553
        • Breuing K.H.
        • Colwell A.S.
        Inferolateral AlloDerm Hammock for implant coverage in breast reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2007; 59: 250-255https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0b013e31802f8426
        • DeLong M.R.
        • Tandon V.J.
        • Farajzadeh M.
        • et al.
        Systematic review of the Impact of acellular dermal matrix on aesthetics and patient satisfaction in tissue expander-to-implant breast reconstructions.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144: 967e-974ehttps://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000006212
        • Margulies I.G.
        • Salzberg C.A.
        The use of acellular dermal matrix in breast reconstruction: evolution of techniques over 2 decades.
        Gland Surg. 2019; 8: 3-10https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2018.10.05
        • Vardanian A.J.
        • Clayton J.L.
        • Roostaeian J.
        • et al.
        Comparison of immediate implant-based reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126: 22https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000388739.17215.17
        • Gamboa-Bobadilla G.M.
        Implant breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2006; 56: 22-25https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000185460.31188.c1
        • Downs R.K.
        • Hedges K.
        An alternative technique for immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction—a case series.
        Plast Reconstr Surg - Glob Open. 2016; 4e821https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000000839
        • Spiegel A.
        Breast reconstruction: current Perspectives and state of the Art techniques.
        BoD – Books on Demand, 2013
        • Pien I.
        • Anolik R.
        • Blau J.
        • et al.
        Delayed implant augmentation of breast free flaps.
        J Reconstr Microsurgery. 2015; 31: 254-260https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1395416
        • Lee H.C.
        • Lee J.
        • Park S.-H.
        • et al.
        The hybrid latissimus dorsi flap in immediate breast reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2020; 86: 394-399https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000002565
        • Jansen L.A.
        • Macadam S.A.
        The Use of AlloDerm in Postmastectomy alloplastic breast reconstruction: Part II. A cost Analysis.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127: 2245-2254https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3182131c6b
        • Salzberg C.A.
        • Ashikari A.Y.
        • Berry C.
        • et al.
        Acellular dermal matrix–Assisted direct-to-implant breast reconstruction and capsular contracture.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 138: 329-337https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000002331
        • Qureshi A.A.
        • Broderick K.
        • Funk S.
        • et al.
        Direct Hospital cost of outcome Pathways in implant-based reconstruction with acellular dermal matrices.
        Plast Reconstr Surg - Glob Open. 2016; 4e831https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000000848
        • Figus A.
        • Canu V.
        • Iwuagwu F.C.
        • et al.
        DIEP flap with implant: a further option in optimising breast reconstruction.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009; 62: 1118-1126https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2007.12.089
        • Rodebeck E.
        • Blum C.
        • DellaCroce F.
        Stacked DIEP and implant for unilateral breast reconstruction.
        J Reconstr Microsurgery Open. 2017; 02: e124-e125https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1606355
        • Momeni A.
        • Becker A.
        • Torio-Padron N.
        • et al.
        Nipple reconstruction: Evidence-based Trials in the plastic surgical Literature.
        Aesthet Plast Surg. 2007; 32: 18-20https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-9039-0
        • Chang D.W.
        • Barnea Y.
        • Robb G.L.
        Effects of an autologous flap combined with an implant for breast reconstruction: an evaluation of 1000 Consecutive reconstructions of previously irradiated breasts.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008; 122: 356-362https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e31817d6303
        • Collins J.B.
        • Verheyden C.N.
        Incidence of breast hematoma after placement of breast Prostheses.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129: 413e-420ehttps://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3182402ce0
      3. Breast implants - Certain labeling Recommendations to improve patient Communication. U.S. Food and drug Administration.
        (Available at:) (Accessed May 18, 2022)
        • Chung K.C.
        • Malay S.
        • Shauver M.J.
        • et al.
        Economic Analysis of screening Strategies for rupture of silicone Gel breast implants.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 130: 225-237https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e318254b43b
        • Walters III, J.A.
        • Sato E.A.
        • Martinez C.A.
        • et al.
        Delayed Mammoplasty with silicone Gel implants following DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg - Glob Open. 2015; 3e540https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000000527
        • Alba B.
        • Schultz B.D.
        • Cohen D.
        • et al.
        Risk-to-Benefit relationship of Contralateral Prophylactic mastectomy: the Argument for bilateral Mastectomies with immediate reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144: 1-9
        • Weichman K.E.
        • Broer P.N.
        • Thanik V.D.
        • et al.
        Patient-reported satisfaction and quality of life following breast reconstruction in thin patients: a Comparison between microsurgical and prosthetic implant recipients.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015; 136: 213-220
        • Weichman K.E.
        • Tanna N.
        • Broer P.N.
        • et al.
        Microsurgical breast reconstruction in thin patients: the Impact of low body Mass Indices.
        J Reconstr Microsurg. 2015; 31: 20-25
        • Tanna N.
        • Broer P.N.
        • Weichman K.E.
        • et al.
        Microsurgical breast reconstruction for nipple-sparing mastectomy.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013; 131 (139e-47e)
        • Tanna N.
        • Clayton J.L.
        • Roostaeian J.
        • et al.
        The volume-outcome relationship for immediate breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 129: 19-24