Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 50, ISSUE 2, P301-312, April 2023

Lumbar Artery Perforator Flaps in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Clinics in Plastic Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Holmstorm H.
        The free abdominoplasty flap and its use in breast reconstruction.
        Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979; 13: 423
        • Allen R.J.
        • Treece P.
        Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction.
        Ann Plast Surg. 1994; 32: 32-38
        • Guerra A.B.
        • Metzinger S.E.
        • Bidros R.S.
        • et al.
        Breast reconstruction with gluteal artery perforator (GAP) flaps: a critical analysis of 142 cases.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2004; 52: 118-125
        • LoTempio M.M.
        • Allen R.J.
        Breast reconstruction with SGAP and IGAP flaps.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126: 393-401
        • Myers P.L.
        • Nelson J.A.
        • Allen Jr., R.J.
        Alternative flaps in autologous breast reconstruction.
        Gland Surg. 2021; 10: 444
        • Opsomer D.
        • Stillaert F.
        • Blondeel P.
        • et al.
        The lumbar artery perforator flap in autologous breast reconstruction: initial experience with 100 cases.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 142: 1e-8e
        • Haddock N.T.
        • Teotia S.S.
        Lumbar artery perforator flap: initial experience with simultaneous bilateral flaps for breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020; 8: e2800
        • Rohrich R.J.
        • Smith P.D.
        • Marcantonio D.R.
        • et al.
        The zones of adherence: role in minimizing and preventing contour deformities in liposuction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001; 107: 1562-1569
        • Tuinder S.M.
        • Beugels J.
        • Lataster A.
        • et al.
        The lateral thigh perforator flap for autologous breast reconstruction: a prospective analysis of 138 flaps.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 141: 257-268
        • Lockwood T.E.
        Lower-body lift.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2001; 21: 355-369
        • Vonu P.M.
        • Chopan M.
        • Sayadi L.
        • et al.
        Lumbar artery perforator flaps: a systematic review of free tissue transfers and anatomical characteristics.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2022; 89: 10-97
        • Roche N.A.
        • Van Landuyt K.
        • Blondeel P.N.
        • et al.
        The use of pedicled perforator flaps for reconstruction of lumbosacral defects.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2000; 45: 7-14
        • De Weerd L.
        • Weum S.
        The butterfly design: coverage of a large sacral defect with two pedicled lumbar artery perforator flaps.
        Br J Plast Surg. 2002; 55: 251-253
        • De Weerd L.
        • Elvenes O.P.
        • Strandenes E.
        • et al.
        Autologous breast reconstruction with a free lumbar artery perforator flap.
        Br J Plast Surg. 2003; 56: 180-183
        • Opsomer D.
        • Vyncke T.
        • Depypere B.
        • et al.
        Lumbar flap versus the gold standard: comparison to the DIEP flap.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 145: 706e-714e
        • Greenspun D.T.
        Discussion: lumbar flap versus the gold standard: comparison to the DIEP flap.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 145: 715e-716e
        • Kato H.
        • Hasegawa M.
        • Takada T.
        • et al.
        The lumbar artery perforator based island flap: anatomical study and case reports.
        Br J Plast Surg. 1999; 52: 541-546
        • Lui K.W.
        • Hu S.
        • Ahmad N.
        • et al.
        Three-dimensional angiography of the superior gluteal artery and lumbar artery perforator flap.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 123: 79-86
        • Bissell M.B.
        • Greenspun D.T.
        • Levine J.
        • et al.
        The lumbar artery perforator flap: 3-dimensional anatomical study and clinical applications.
        Ann Plast Surg. 2016; 77: 469-476
        • Mujtaba B.
        • Hanafy A.K.
        • Largo R.D.
        • et al.
        The lumbar artery perforator flap: clinical review and guidance on image reporting.
        Clin Radiol. 2019; 74: 756-762
        • Kiil B.J.
        • Rozen W.M.
        • Pan W.R.
        • et al.
        The lumbar artery perforators: a cadaveric and clinical anatomical study.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 123: 1229-1238
        • Santillan A.
        • Nacarino V.
        • Greenberg E.
        • et al.
        Vascular anatomy of the spinal cord.
        J neurointerventional Surg. 2012; 4: 67-74
        • Johnson P.T.
        • Mahesh M.
        • Fishman E.K.
        Image wisely and choosing wisely: importance of adult body CT protocol design for patient safety, exam quality, and diagnostic efficacy.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2015; 12: 1185-1190
        • Mayo-Smith W.W.
        • Morin R.L.
        Image wisely: the beginning, current status, and future opportunities.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2017; 14: 442-443
        • Vasile J.V.
        • Levine J.L.
        Magnetic resonance angiography in perforator flap breast reconstruction.
        Gland Surg. 2016; 5: 197
        • Hamdi M.
        • Craggs B.
        • Brussaard C.
        • et al.
        Lumbar artery perforator flap: an anatomical study using multidetector computed tomographic scan and surgical pearls for breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016; 138: 343-352